To the cruel-mean people of the Indian Cinema,
~Why are terrorists or revolutionists always portrayed angry and stupid? Could the real guys sue the movie makers for it?
I mean, he could finish off the hero the first time he sees him (A head shot would be nice!) rather than letting him go and consequently getting killed by him later, after a most probable hostage situation.
~Why is he still a terrorist, if he cant handle firearms properly? He doesnt even shoot at our hero correctly for 'once' and even if he does, why the shoulder always?
Seriously what happened to the Kalashnikovs, the AK 47s or the C4s that he should have been well equipped with, rather than the shitty weapons he is forced to use while our hero is the one handling a Dragunov Sniper!
~And what is it with the mono-numerology? Why is it always a Wasim or Abdullah or some ***llah? It could as well be a James or a Yung Mang Chang or a Vishnu Gowthem or even a Koundamani. Terrorists should be allowed to have cool names!
~Why does every terrorist sport a long beard and a very sharp nose?
Its as if the Japanese and the other blunt nosed people are incapable of terrorizing acts!
And again Tamil directors! With the konjam-konjam Tamil he speaks, he brainwashes young minds? Not buying it!
~He shouldn't be portrayed psychotic by killing one of his own men. We would like him to do that to enemies instead.
~Also any terrorist should be given his space in the movie, say a possible if-not-foreign country, atleast-ullooor duet with his loved one.
Yours Sincerely,
The Mookan from the Vijayakanth/Arjun Movies.
No comments:
Post a Comment